K-Bomb says what?The smell coming from Foster and Christiana
mattkennedy
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit mattkennedy's Xanga Site!

Name: Matt
Country: United States
State: Illinois
Metro: Chicago


Interests: Music, Movies, Books, Cooking, Camping, Video Games, Art, Sports
Expertise: Hardly an expert but adept at: Youth Ministry, Offending, Rocking out, Going to Seminary, Bartending, Cheesemongering, websurfing, and Candy Machine Repair.
Occupation: Student
Industry: Religion


Message: message meEmail: email me
Website: visit my website


Member Since: 1/5/2006

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Blogrings
The Covenant Connection
previous - random - next

Christian's for Social Justice
previous - random - next

CCACC- Cascades, the siren that calls us to serve.
previous - random - next

Consistant Life Ethic
previous - random - next

There is life after North Park.
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Monday, February 11, 2008

Moving on

Since my life has changed dramatically in the last few months, I've concluded that my blogging life could stand to have a new direction.  I'm shutting down the operation here at xanga and starting a new joint blog with my beloved.  You can read about what life for us is now like at http://witheachpassingmoment.blogspot.com


Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Spineless

So last year one of the few reasons I was glad for a new political party to assume control of congress was to finally hold the executive branch accountable to the constitution and to the law.  Turns out that my hope was wasted, and the democratic congress is a waste of breath.  The new attorney general is so scarred to get the Bush administration in trouble he can't even go on record to say that waterboarding is torture.  Yet, congress will give him the rubber stamp.  Shameless.  Its hard not to become apathetic when no one will stand up for your deeply held values.  But the one glimmer of hope is that the public is slowly coming around, if only congress would listen.

Tell your congressional representatives to support the Kennedy ammendment to the military tribunals act to outlaw waterboarding!  And as 2008 rolls around, support the candidates who'll return honor and civility to the armed forces (so far the only viable candidates to go on record promising an end to torture are Obama and McCain).

Ask, "Who would Jesus torture?" and keep hope alive.


Monday, November 05, 2007

Currently Listening
Essence
By Lucinda Williams
see related

Hunting, is it right?

I don't eat a whole lot of meat (for an American) but my conscience moves me to eat less than I currently do to be a more responsible consumer of creation's gifts.  Meat is an inefficient food supply, requiring many more acres of agricultural land than an equivalent vegetable crop (and Ronald Reagan was right, bovine methane is a major contributor to greenhouse gas).  My personal philosophy that I aspire to is this: when I am a guest and meat is served to me, I do not abstain.  When I know where my meat comes from and that it is treated humanely (vegetarian fed, hormone-free, free range, and preferably local) I eat with clean conscience, and all this in moderation to recognize that in most places meat is a delicacy and a luxury (not a staple).

I also think that we Americans are to unfamiliar with our meat.  It comes neatly wrapped and pre-prepared so we don't have to deal with the ugly realities that our dinner once had four legs and walked the earth.  Most of our grandparents lived in this reality.  Some still do.  I have great admiration/envy for those fortunate to live “off the grid” and as part of that will occasionally hunt to supplement their diet as a matter of health and survival.

But a recent conversation I shared with my spouse has me thinking about the ethics of sport hunting.  For one; by its very name it says this is not something necessary for survival but something done for entertainment.  It could be countered, “I don’t do it just  for the trophy,” but does a freezer full of venison really equal sustenance?   I think for a large majority, the food is inconsequential, it is the trophy that motivates—the sport of killing an animal.  Secondly and what may be surprising is that my main objection is less about the animals but more about the money.  See if you can follow me here:

Though U.S. urban areas are blighted with poverty, the average face of poverty in this country is actually a rural one.  Poor people don’t golf or ski, because they can’t afford to.  The sport of choice in urban areas is most often basketball because you can play it any where with minimal equipment.  One of the most popular sports in rural America is hunting, but this is not an economical alternative like basketball is to urban youth.  I’m not a hunter, but as I understand it there is a raging market for hunting supplies (guns, bows, ammo, stands, hunting clothes, boots, camping gear, the giant pickup, the ATV, and vacation hours)—this is thousands and thousands of dollars being poured into the sport!  When so many families struggle to get by in rural America, could not the economic resources of rural communities be better invested in family life!

My critique is mostly against the capitalistic culture of hunting; we’ve taken a practice original intended for sustenance and survival and made it an “unsportsmanlike” excess.  Excess, America’s favorite vice.

I know that I could be coming across as a pinko city boy who doesn’t know what he’s talking about.  I can concede that.  I merely ask the question; is the current hunting culture good for America’s rural communities?  Is it justifiable by a Christian ethic of stewardship?  It’s also not my intention to single out the outdoors enthusiast; I can ask the question about so many of our entertainment pursuits.  My thinking is far from settled on the matter, but it is worth thinking about.


Monday, October 29, 2007

Cheese of the Week: Bathtub

Ahh, delicious bathtub cheese!  What great texture and taste that comes from your bathtub!  Ugh, if I made cheese from my bathtub I'm pretty sure it would not be delicious.  Maybe gritty, but not delicious.  Matt's bathtub cheese: a little bit of Matt Kennedy in every bite.

Actually, homemade unpasteurized cheeses are not bad for you.  The slight danger of the bacteria is really only to be applied to the unborn, young children, and perhaps an elderly person without a good immune system.  Contrary to popular belief, unpasteurized cheese can be bought and sold many places in the United States.  Still, its best to get it from an established dairy/cheesemaker... not some dude with a bathtub and time on his hands.

This would be a good opportunity to talk about Mexican cheeses though.  If you are unsatisfied with your cheap American Cheddars and Monterey Jacks not really complimenting your Mexican food, it doesn't take too much searching to find some good Queso to melt on enchiladas, burritos, or quesadillas (some supermarket chains carry it, but it is easily found in ethnic markets).   Queso Chihuahua is mild, salty, and melts nicely like a good mozzarella (less oily than cheap American cheese, and the price is comparable).  Don't worry white people; Queso Chihuahua does not come from dog milk.  Note that the packaging on Mexican Cheese is all very similar.  Today I made the mistake of picking up Queso Fresco, which is much more like a Feta (and does not melt well).


Thursday, October 18, 2007

On Immigration, Part II

Here's an interesting interview with an economist on immigration.  Its well worth the read.  I'm not an economist, so I don't really know how best to understand his argument against others, but on a certain level it does make sense to me.  Since I'm not an economist but a pastor, my chief concern is attitudes and moral reflection on the issue.  As I said last summer, I'm still concerned about the xenophobia of the debate.  I truly believe people of good conscience can come to various conclusions about the current state of immigration we are in for reasons relating to law, economy, and common good--but it is Christianly indefensible to let xenophobia determine our response.  It does seem that a pervasive underlying argument against increased Latino immigration is a belief that homogeneity is better for society as there is less conflict.  This may be true, but for people of faith, does that make it right?  One of the great movements of the Church in the New Testament was the integration of diverse peoples, "Jews and Greeks, Slave and Free" (1 Corinthians 12.13).  The vision of diverse believers gathered in eternity, “from every tribe and language and people and nation” (Revelation 5.9) should be a vision for the Church in the present.  This principle should shape the attitudes of believers.  In the larger legal-social setting, the implications of the pursuit of homogeneity are frightening; at what point would we return to institutionalized segregation?

Practically speaking, I certainly observe the benefits of immigration that the author notes, but I'm not sure I agree with "open" immigration as the best policy.  While 19th century immigration was a boon to this country and it was to some extent "open", it did take place within certain controllable parameters (specifically: to get to America from Europe you had to go by boat and there were only so many entry points to the U.S.).  An "open border" along the southern U.S. would present some security issues as well as the prospect of a truly mass migration leaving both countries scrambling to sustain their infrastructure.  To improve and make right the situation I would suggest a modified version of the idea tossed around last year (before congress killed it and likely set us back many decades).

1.) Give immediate legal status to the current undocumented population in the form of "guest worker status" that includes a pathway to citizenship pending certain stipulations are meant.
2.) Overhaul the current immigration system and expand it to meet the growth of need/supply of Latin American immigrants.  Streamline and simplify the system, increase intake of applications, and supplement fees with business revenue that will benefit from the migrant workforce. Expand investment in "integration" programs that include more access to ESL classes.
3.) Increase security along the border, but as much investment goes into security it should be matched with investment towards integration efforts.

As I understand it, this is a decent way for Christians to pursue a common good with the U.S. and Latin America. The US Conference of Catholic Bishops had some words of guidance we would be wise to take to heart, "the State has a serious responsibility to protect its citizens and this may entail strong immigration controls.  At the same time however, the Church says human beings have a right to migrate--particularly in search of work in order to improve their human condition and provide for the needs of their families."



Next 5 >>